140k views
1 vote
When looking at the rational function f of x equals the quantity x minus one times the quantity x plus two times the quantity x plus four all divided by the quantity x plus one times the quantity x minus two times the quantity x minus four , Sue and Ed have two different thoughts. Sue says that the graph of the function has zeros at x = −1, x = 2, and x = 4. Ed says that the function is undefined at those x values and discontinuities are created in the graph . Who is correct? Justify your reasoning by explaining the difference between zeros and discontinuities. (10 points)

1 Answer

3 votes

As per the given question, the expression of the function
f(x) is as:


f(x)=((x-1)(x+2)(x+4))/((x+1)(x-2)(x-4))

Now, as per the definition of zeros, the zero is that value of x which when plugged into the function should make the function zero (it is also called "making the function vanish"). In our case, plugging in "zero values" of x should make the numerator zero without making the denominator zero. Now, if we plug in the given values of x, which are x=-1, x=2 and x=4 in the function we see that the numerator does not become a zero but the denominator does.

Thus, x=-1, x=2 and x=4 are not the zeros of the function and therefore, Sue is wrong. However, we do have discontinuities at the aforementioned values of x because the denominator becomes a zero at those points and as per the definition of a discontinuity the denominator should be a zero at that point. Therefore, Ed is correct.

User Zibbobz
by
7.5k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories