Question

Which of the following was stated as part of the Dred Scott v. Sandford ruling?

Answer 1

The Supreme Court's ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford stated that Black people, whether enslaved or free, could not be U.S. citizens and had no right to sue in federal courts. It also held that residence in free territory did not grant freedom to slaves and declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the historic 1857 case Dred Scott v. Sandford, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered a momentous ruling that has been critically regarded in the annals of U.S. judicial history. Chief Justice Roger Taney, speaking for the majority, stated that Dred Scott, an enslaved African American, had no legal standing to sue in federal court because he, as well as all Black people, whether enslaved or free, were not considered citizens of the United States.

The Court further declared that Scott's residence in a free territory did not entitle him to freedom upon returning to a slave state. The ruling also stated that the Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the U.S. territories, effectively rendering the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional. This decision implicitly supported the expansion of slavery, emphasizing that slaves were property protected under the Constitution.

Answer 2

A case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1857 and seen as a landmark decision in the debate surrounding the constitutionality and legality of slavery.