81.0k views
2 votes
How did the Supreme Court majority argue the law of "separate but equal" was not discrimination? Check all of the boxes that apply.

User Epool
by
7.3k points

2 Answers

1 vote

Answer: The constitution did not protect social rights, only civil and political rights

It was there to help preserve the peace and public order

Step-by-step explanation:

User Ajxs
by
7.4k points
2 votes
  • It was said to help preserve the peace and public order.
  • It supposedly provided “separate but equal” facilities.

on the 'nuity

User Moinkhan
by
7.4k points