172k views
0 votes
Jacqueline barden was shopping for school clothes with her children when her purse and automobile were taken

User Muvimotv
by
8.3k points

2 Answers

3 votes

In Turner v. State of Arkansas (2012), the evidence was deemed sufficient to uphold Turner's conviction for credit- and debit-card theft. Her attempted use of stolen cards, recognition from witnesses, and admission of possession contributed to the case's strength.

In the case of Turner v. State of Arkansas (2012), the evidence appears to be sufficient to uphold Turner's conviction for credit- and debit-card theft. Several factors support this conclusion:

1. **Attempted Credit Card Use:** Turner was caught attempting to use Barden's credit card at a local Exxon gas station. The fact that the gas station attendant recognized her from prior criminal activities adds credibility to the claim that she had possession of the stolen credit card.

2. **Criminal History:** The gas station attendant's recognition of Turner from prior bad check incidents and unauthorized credit card use strengthens the prosecution's case. It establishes a pattern of criminal behavior and suggests Turner's familiarity with such activities.

3. **Arrest at Wal-Mart:** Turner's arrest at Wal-Mart while attempting to use one of Barden's checks further supports the prosecution's case. The clerk's recognition of Turner from previous criminal activities adds weight to the argument that Turner was knowingly in possession of stolen checks and cards.

4. **Turner's Admission:** Turner admitted that a friend had given her checks and credit cards to use at Wal-Mart. This admission suggests that she was aware of the fraudulent nature of the cards and checks, even if she claimed not to have stolen them directly.

Considering these factors, the evidence appears sufficient to establish Turner's involvement in credit- and debit-card theft. The recognition by multiple witnesses from different locations, Turner's attempted use of the stolen cards, and her admission to being in possession of the items all contribute to the strength of the case against her.

The probable question may be:

Jacqueline Barden was shopping for school clothes with her children when her purse and automobile were taken. In Barden’s purse were her car keys, credit and debit cards for herself and her children, as well as the children’s Social Security cards and birth certificates needed for enrollment at school. Immediately after the purse and car were stolen, Rebecca Mary Turner attempted to use Barden’s credit card at a local Exxon gas station, but the card was declined. The gas station attendant recognized Turner because she had previously written bad checks and used credit cards that did not belong to her. Turner was later arrested while attempting to use one of Barden’s checks to pay for merchandise at a Wal-Mart—where the clerk also recognized Turner from prior criminal activity. Turner claimed that she had not stolen Barden’s purse or car, and that a friend had told her he had some checks and credit cards and asked her to try using them at Wal-Mart. Turner was convicted at trial. She appealed, claiming that there was insufficient evidence that she committed credit- and debit-card theft. Was the evidence sufficient to uphold her conviction? Why or why not? [Turner v. State of Arkansas, 2012 Ark.App. 150 (2012)] (See Property Crime.)

User Stoneyan
by
8.4k points
3 votes

Jacqueline Barden's purse and automobile was taken

In her purse were her car keys, her credit card and debit cards as well as her children. Also the children’s civil defense passes and births licenses required for registration at the school was in Barden's purse. Instantly, subsequent handbag and vehicle were burglarized, Rebecca Mary Turner tried to use Barden’s credit card at a regional Exxon gas occupation, but the card was failed.

The gas station assistant identified Turner because she had earlier composed bad drafts and used balance cards that did not concern to her. Turner was next captured while endeavoring to utilize one of Barden’s depositions to give for commodities at a Wal-Mart. Turner commanded that she had not take Barden’s purse or car.

A colleague had told to her that he did not have any checks, balance cards and challenged her to work utilizing them at Wal-Mart. Turner was sentenced at a test. She requested insisting that there was inadequate testimony that she performed balance and charge slip crime. Turner has preceding archives of this sort of performance and she must be condemned of crime.


User Viriato
by
8.4k points