22.0k views
3 votes
N McCulloch v. Maryland, what did the State of Maryland argue?

User Sevle
by
7.9k points

2 Answers

2 votes

Hello! In McCulloch vs Maryland, the State of Maryland argued that McCulloch, a cashier at the bank, needed to pay his taxes. The final result was that Maryland didn't have the authority to tax the bank. Hope this helps! ^-^

User Lance Cleveland
by
8.1k points
3 votes
The state of Maryland argued that they have the right to tax a federal bank when it's utilizing state lands
Obviously the case went to McCulloch and that's why states are not allowed to tax federal banks
User Raoul
by
7.2k points

Related questions

asked Aug 7, 2017 215k views
Jmervine asked Aug 7, 2017
by Jmervine
8.1k points
2 answers
1 vote
215k views
2 answers
0 votes
129k views
asked Nov 26, 2019 24.1k views
Waygood asked Nov 26, 2019
by Waygood
7.7k points
2 answers
2 votes
24.1k views
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.