28.0k views
4 votes
According to howard, barrett, and frick (2010), in order to make appropriate choices educators must understand the ways in which hiding or showing the identity of participants can impact the interaction that takes place in peer feedback activities. obscuring the identity of participants in peer feedback "may create a social context where learners feel freer to express varied ideas, and make the task of giving feedback less inhibited" (p. 90).

User Granicus
by
6.8k points

2 Answers

3 votes

Final answer:

Anonymity in peer feedback activities can create an environment for open expression and constructive criticism. Educators must be keenly aware of social dynamics when making decisions about participant identity disclosure. Sensitivity to context is crucial in both educational settings and research methodologies.

Step-by-step explanation:

When engaging in peer feedback activities within educational settings, anonymity can influence how participants interact and share their thoughts. As Howard, Barrett, and Frick (2010) suggest, hiding the identities of participants might foster an environment where learners feel more comfortable expressing diverse opinions without feeling constrained. This can lead to less inhibited feedback and potentially more honest and constructive critiques.

In situations where educators need to make choices about whether to reveal identities, understanding the social dynamics at play is critical. For example, when children engage in competitive activities, such as relay races or math contests, they learn about winning and losing—a reflection of broader societal competitive norms. Conversely, cooperative projects can foster teamwork and mutual support.

Researcher decisions about anonymity and interaction in the research process must be handled with sensitivity to context. This involves a balance between being overt and covert, as well as understanding when to provide full disclosure to participants. The nuances of these approaches can significantly affect the data collected and the ethical implications of the research.

User Mandar Belkunde
by
6.7k points
4 votes

In a difficult job such as designing a website for education, professors may require the further creation of multiple resolutions in students' companion feedback. Anonymity may generate a social connection where students feel easier to express different opinions and execute the task of providing feedback less frustrated. However, educators demand how anonymity influences the training productive in order to obtain informed decisions about during anonymous arrangements are suitable in equal feedback.

User Myles
by
6.9k points