Question

Relationship Among Ideas: Identify and explain any opposing claims Jefferson anticipates. What counterarguments does he offer? How do these relate to his overall argument?


Author’s Methods: What claims does Jefferson make about governments? How do these claims impact his argument?

Author’s Methods: What is the persuasive effect of his language in the closing paragraphs?



Drawing an Inference: Can we infer anything about Jefferson’s intended audience based on his diction?

Structure: Looking back over the entire text, what is distinctive about the structure of Jefferson’s argument? How does the structure contribute to the impact of the argument.

Answer 1

Machiavelli claims that a leader must find a balance between a temperate and a cruel attitude to be successful. He makes a very effective argument. First, he uses deductive reasoning by stating a conclusion that he used to prove his point. He says that if a leader is not cruel, his subject will rebel and no one will be the law. Second, his evidence is compelling. Machiavelli uses historical examples to support his ideas, which are clear and interesting to read. Finally, he uses sophisticated diction, creating a serious tone that provides a sense of authority. His reasoning, evidence, and diction all work together to support his claim, making his argument both horrifying and effective.

Explanation:

It's all about trust folks

Answer 2

The answer is There is purpose behind partition. The purposes behind division.

Explanation:

A counterargument is a perspective that restricts your principle contention. Counterarguments are a piece of good enticing composition and talking procedure since they demonstrate that you've thought about different perspectives. They likewise set up the opportunity to negate the resistance and show why your position is the correct one to have. Counterargument Examples. When composing a conclusion, a scholastic article, or other paper demonstrating opposite sides of an issue, it includes the consideration of a contention. A proposition is proposed, and afterward proof is offered recommending the postulation is valid