219k views
0 votes
Read the passage and answer the question that follows:

Despite our best efforts as parents, we will always make mistakes in raising our children. It's inevitable. There are so many decisions to be made in any given day, week, month, or year. It's an inhuman task to make all of these decisions correctly. Who would even want to try for perfection?

We shouldn't worry too much, though, because it is precisely our mistakes that teach our children the most about life. Life is full of mistakes, obstacles, and trouble. Shielding our children from these by striving for perfection in our own parenting does them no favors.

Given this, a parent might be tempted to give up trying to make good decisions and simply let the chips fall where they may. Admittedly, that attitude is not without its benefits, but it goes too far in the other direction. Children are much more observant than we think, but often draw the wrong conclusions from what they observe. If we give up trying to make the right decisions, they might get the message that we don't care about their future.

We can take comfort in this much: we teach our children even when we're not trying to. That doesn't mean we should stop trying to do our best, to make the right decisions whenever possible. It just means that we shouldn't beat ourselves up when we make mistakes. Either it won't matter because it's something small, or it just might build some character in our children, a commodity that will serve them well.

Which of these best explains why the argument in this passage is weak?

The argument doesn't take into account opposing points of view.
The argument relies on attacking a weak version of the opposition.
The claim is not valid.
The argument relies on claims that are not backed up by facts.

User Kmt
by
8.1k points

2 Answers

2 votes

The argument relies on claims that are not backed up by facts! Upon reading this you see it seems as a parent wrote it from their own point of view.

User Christopher Smit
by
8.0k points
2 votes

Answer:

The argument relies on claims that are not backed up by facts.

Step-by-step explanation:

This argument is weak because it relies on claims that are not backed up by facts. Although the passage states several things that might be useful to people, it does so without providing evidence that supports this position. Therefore, we cannot establish whether the evidence provided is trustworthy and can be believed, or whether it is simply based on guesses from someone who is not an expert.

User AfterWorkGuinness
by
7.3k points