Register
The ways in which art historians and critics evaluate art are by the aesthetic value, content and meaning of the work A: True B: False
35.8k views
1 vote
The ways in which art historians and critics evaluate art are by the aesthetic value, content and meaning of the work

A: True


B: False

User Alexis Seigneurin
by
7.2k points

2 Answers

1 vote
I think that it is false
User Vinay Sandesh
by
6.0k points
6 votes

This statement is actually true. Art critics usually criticize art in the context of Aesthetics or theory of beauty.

User Ansetou
by
6.9k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

7.2m questions

9.6m answers

Other Questions

Which statement about the artist Michelangelo is not correct? A. He admired the classical past of Greece and Rome and the humanist ideals of the Renaissance. B. He enjoyed an easygoing and respectful relationship
Classify a rhombus in as many ways as possible.
Which northern European Renaissance artist painted portraits of the royal household of King Henry VIII? In the portraits he was able to reveal each subject's personality. A. Albrecht Durer B. Pieter Bruegel
Which of the following statements about the tragedies of Euripides and Sophocles is correct? Their works were performed as part of religious festivals. The Athenian government paid citizens to attend performances
On what basis did children recieve their life assignments in the noveel the giver
Link Copied!