Question

Why fines are ineffective as legal punishment?

Answer 1

My name is Bella Thorne, and this is the story of the time I found out I had dyslexia. I remember when I started first grade. Right away, it was awful because I couldn't read as well as the other kids. My brain mixed up letters like b and d and m and w. Dyslexia is different for EVERYONE who has it. For me, it just made it harder to read or write. I started working really hard on how to read better. My family helped me by making me read everything from menus, to cereal boxes, to road signs. Today, I read a year above my grade level. And I learned to face my problems, not run away from them. Dyslexia makes things hard for me but, not impossible. You just watched a TTI, on Disney Channel

Answer 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Fines are ineffective as legal punishment by a court of law for crime or other related offences because they are mostly use for minor crime and violation while most serious crimes offenders are punished by imprisonment by the court of law.

Fines are just a more lenient form of punishment than prison, and cannot deter those who commit more serious crimes that why they are ineffective as a legal punishment.

Therefore fines is an inadequate response to violent crimes. It can also give people a financial incentive to frame other people for crimes they didn't commit.