The answer is "Evasion of peer review."
Pseudoscience comprises of proclamations, convictions, or practices that are professed to be both logical and genuine, yet are inconsistent with the logical method.
Evasion of peer review before publicizing results. Some advocates of thoughts that repudiate acknowledged logical hypotheses abstain from subjecting their plans to peer survey, at times in light of the fact that companion audit is one-sided towards set up ideal models, and here and there in light of the fact that statements can't be assessed satisfactorily utilizing standard logical strategies.