Question

Why did Anti-Federalists insist that a bill of rights be included in the Constitution?

They believed that local and state governments needed to be less powerful.
They worried that the framers did not believe in basic human rights.
They wanted to place more limits on the power of a strong central government.
They wanted to ensure that all adults in the United States could fully participate in government.

Answer 1

C. They wanted to place more limits on the power of a strong central government.

Local and state governments were less powerful under the constitution, in fact, weaker under the centralized government of the constitution more so than they were in the Articles of Confederation.

There’s no evidence that framers didn’t believe in human rights, and the constitution in fact fights for liberty in the very opening paragraph.

Anti-Federalists did want as many people as possible to fully participate in government, but that is NOT why they advocated for the bill of rights.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

C. They wanted to place more limits on the power of a strong central government.

Local and state governments were less powerful under the constitution, in fact, weaker under the centralized government of the constitution more so than they were in the Articles of Confederation.
There’s no evidence that framers didn’t believe in human rights, and the constitution in fact fights for liberty in the very opening paragraph.
Anti-Federalists did want as many people as possible to fully participate in government, but that is NOT why they advocated for the bill of rights.