Question

How does the interpretive framework differ from the scientific method when conducting sociological research?

Answer 1

The interpretive framework and the scientific method are two different approaches to conducting sociological research. The scientific method is systematic and aims to find generalizable results, while the interpretive framework focuses on in-depth knowledge and understanding of the human experience. The scientific method prioritizes objectivity, while the interpretive framework emphasizes subjectivity.

Step-by-step explanation:

The interpretive framework and the scientific method are two different approaches to conducting sociological research. The scientific method is a systematic approach that uses hypothesis testing and aims to find generalizable results. It involves steps such as asking a question, researching existing sources, formulating a hypothesis, conducting a study, and drawing conclusions.

On the other hand, the interpretive framework seeks to understand social worlds from the perspective of participants. It focuses on in-depth knowledge and understanding of the human experience. Rather than formulating a hypothesis, interpretive researchers use descriptive or narrative findings and may involve direct observation or storytelling.

Answer 2

I believe the answer is: its findings are more narrative

The conclusion that derived from interpretative framework is made through the researcher's personal observation or interaction. Which mean that they cannot really be supported by objective evidence and tend to be very opinion based compared to scientific method.