160k views
2 votes
If you eat candy all that candy then you will get sick. if you get sick then you won't be able to go to the dance. if you don't go to the dance you won't be able to dance with hilary. if you don't get to dance with hilary then you will be miserable. so you shouldn't eat it. what is the conclusion of this argument?

2 Answers

7 votes

Final answer:

The conclusion of this argument is that you should avoid eating the candy to prevent a chain of negative outcomes, ultimately leading to misery from not dancing with Hilary.

Step-by-step explanation:

The conclusion of this argument is that you shouldn't eat the candy. The argument is structured as a chain of events that leads to a negative outcome: eating candy might make you sick, being sick may prevent you from going to the dance, missing the dance would mean not dancing with Hilary, and not dancing with Hilary is presumed to lead to misery. Based on this sequence of potential outcomes, the argument reaches the conclusion that to avoid this unfortunate chain of events, the best course of action is to avoid eating the candy in the first place.

User Kangear
by
5.5k points
6 votes
Don't have too much of something
User David Montgomery
by
5.7k points