Since none of the options make sense with 23, I assume it was a typo, and you meant 2/3.
Let l,w and h be the length, width and height of the original prism, and l',w' and h' be the length, width and height of the new prism. We are given

Also, if we call V the original volume, and V' the volume of the new prism, we have

Substitute the expressions for l', h' and w' in the formula for V':
