This is very similar to the previous problem.
Again, the shape of the parent function resembles a square-root function, sqrt(x).
We will examine the values, first translating the beginning of the graph (-3,0) to the origin, i.e. translating to the right by 3 units.
We will extract a few key points,
(you don't have to physically move the curve, just "pretend" (-3,0) is the origin, and count the squares)
(0,0),
(1,2),
(4,4),
(5,4.4)
It looks like the graph is a vertical stretch of the square-root function by a scale factor of two. We will check the points again by dividing the y-values by two:
(0,0)
(1,1)
(4,2)
(5,2.2)
Which corresponds exactly with a square-root function (at least for the points we chose).
What have we done so far: translate to the right, reduced by a factor of two.
So if we start from the parent function, f(x)=sqrt(x), we will just do the inverse transformations, namely, stretch vertically by two, and translate to the LEFT by 3.
The transformation
g(x)=a*f(x-h)+k
will stretch f(x) vertically by a scale factor of a, translates to the RIGHT by h, and translate UP by k.
Substituting
a=2
h=-3 (to the left)
k=0 (no vertical translation), we get
g(x)=2f(x-(-3))+0=2sqrt(x+3), which is the required equation of the graph.