Question

In McChulloch v Maryland, what did the state of maryland argue

Answer 1

Answer: I hope this helps you

Step-by-step explanation:

In McCulloch v. Maryland, the state of Maryland argued that the federal government did not have the power to create a national bank and that the state had the authority to tax the bank since it was not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. Maryland also argued that the Necessary and Proper Clause did not give Congress the power to create a bank.

Answer 2

because the Constitution didn't specifically state that the federal government was authorized to charter a bank, the Bank of the United States was unconstitutional.