Question

Question 1(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points) In the lesson, you played the role of a juror in the case of State v. Justin B. Goode. What type of case was it, and what could be its outcome? It was a civil case. Runnuh Bizz was seeking compensation from Goode for the robbery of her video game store. It was a criminal case. Justin B. Goode faced possible jail time for spray-painting government buildings in the city. It was a civil case. Runnuh Bizz was seeking compensation from Goode for repainting several buildings in the city. It was a criminal case. Justin B. Goode faced possible jail time for accusations that he robbed a video game store.

Question 2(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points) Which of these pieces of evidence would be most important for jurors to consider in the case of Snoozer v. Early? Dibeast has lunch every week with Ms. Snoozer and trains her birds. Dibeast saw the birds on Early’s property the day the birds went missing. Dibeast is an animal control officer

Answer 1

Here its D lol

It was a criminal case. Justin B. Goode faced possible jail time for accusations that he robbed a video game store.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

Answers

1. It was a criminal case. Justin B.Goode faced possible jail time for accusations that he robbed a video game store

2. Dibeast saw the birds on Early’s property the day the birds went missing.

Explanation

A Criminal case in most law jurisdictions starts when an individual suspected of a crime is indicted by a jury or charged with the offense by a prosecutor/ district attorney. The case State v. Justin B.Goode is a criminal case where accusations were made against Justin B.Goode on robbing a video game store.

The evidence that could be vital for the jury to consider in the case of Ms Snoozer was that fact that Dibeast saw the birds on Early’s property the day the birds went missing. This could be the starting point to ask Early if the birds really reached the compound. As a civil case, Snoozer was seeking compensation for the loss of her birds.