Register
In Miranda v. _______ , the Supreme Court ruled that a person had to be told of his rights before having to answer any questions pertaining to his guilt or innocence. a. Colorado b. Arizona c. California
231k views
5 votes
In Miranda v. _______ , the Supreme Court ruled that a person had to be told of his rights before having to answer any questions pertaining to his guilt or innocence.

a. Colorado
b. Arizona
c. California

User Bad Loser
by
7.3k points

1 Answer

5 votes
the correct answer is Arizona 
User Pranvera
by
8.3k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

User Pschueller
asked Jul 24, 2024 41.3k views
Which trial procedure is defined as the pronouncement of guilt or innocence?
Pschueller asked Jul 24, 2024
by Pschueller
7.2k points
1 answer
0 votes
41.3k views
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.5m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
How did world war 1 affect the racial and ethnic makeup of american cities
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
What were the positive and negative effects of Egypt being imperialized by Britain.
Link Copied!