Answer: Remember that first-person narration occurs when someone speaks using pronouns such as "I" or "We." Sentence one is one of the correct answers because a narrator speaking in first person is usually a witness to something and can retell the story to another character in the story. The narrator could also retell the tale to the audience. Sentence two is an incorrect response because the first person character may be in a situation where he or she or they do not receive the most accurate information about a particular situation and later discover they were incorrect. This sentence describes a third person narration or a second person narration. Sentences three and four are also incorrect. It says that a first-person narrator is aware of both the past and the present. However, this is more appropriate for a third-person narrative. Maybe it's for second person narration, but authors should know how to do that, in my opinion. Sentence four is also an acceptable response. If the narrator is telling the story in the first person, they should be a character in the story. Sentences five and six are also wrong. This is more appropriate for third person. It's not for first or second place. It would be impossible for a first-person narrator to know everything about all of the characters. Unless this character is a professional stalker.
Explanation: The temporal point of view can refer to narrative tense, or it can refer to how detailed or summarized the narration is. For example, when events are narrated after they have occurred (posterior narration), the narrator is in a privileged position to the characters in the story and can delve into the deeper significance of events and happenings, pointing out the missteps and missed meanings of the characters. The temporal point of view also focuses on the pace of the narration. The narrative pace can either be accelerated or slowed down. Narrative slowing down of narration foregrounds events and suggests what is to be noticed by the reader, whereas summation or acceleration of narrative pace places events and happenings in the background, diminishing their importance. The psychological point of view focuses on the characters' behaviors. Lanser concludes that this is "an extremely complex aspect of point of view, for it encompasses the broad question of the narrator's distance or affinity to each character and event…represented in the text." Negative comments distance the reader from a character's point of view while positive evaluations create affinity with his or her perspective. The phraseological point of view focuses on the speech characteristics of the characters and the narrator. For example, the names, titles, epithets, and sobriquets given to a character may evaluate a character's actions or speech and express a narrative point of view. The ideological point of view is not only "the most basic aspect of point of view" but also the "least accessible to formalization, for its analysis relies to a degree, on intuitive understanding." This aspect of the point of view focuses on the norms, values, beliefs, and Weltanschauung (worldview) of the narrator or a character. The ideological point of view may be stated outright—what Lanser calls "explicit ideology"—or it may be embedded at "deep-structural" levels of the text and not easily identified.