56.3k views
1 vote
Given the conditional statement ~p → q, which statement is logically equivalent?

A. p → ~q
B. ~p → ~q
C. ~q → ~p
D. ~q → p

User Richalot
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

5 votes
Answer: option D. ~q → p


Step-by-step explanation:

1) About notation: ~p means not p and ~q means not q.

The correct notation is with the symbol ~ above the letter, but here the editor does not permit to do that.


2) ~p → q is the conditional if not p then q.


That conditional states that not p (~p) is a sufficient condition to state the true of q.


p is called the antecedent and q is called the consequent.


So, the antecedent implies the consequent.


But, it also means that the negation of the consequent, q, is sufficient to state the negation of the antecedent, not p (double negation of p). That is symbolically represented by:


~q → ~ (~p) ≡ ~ q → p, which is the option D.
User Wouter Neuteboom
by
7.7k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories