Question

In one or two paragraphs, compare and contrast Billy Ansel and Mitchell Stephens. Why did the author set these two characters' sections side by side?

Answer 1

Billy Ansel is the only eyewitness to the crash. He pulls over, calls for emergency help and immediately begins pulling children from the icy water. Even after it is confirmed his own children are dead, Billy continues in the recovery efforts, not wanting to go home and face his tragic reality. Billy is no stranger to untimely death, as he lost his wife to cancer four years earlier and is a veteran of the Vietnam War. The death of his children, however, drives him into alcoholism and isolation. His three-year affair with the married Risa Walker ends when the two feel awkward around each other following the deaths of the children. You can also get assisted with it if you turn for the help to the best site. Go to Primewritings if you are interested in the unplagiarized text.

Answer 2

The author sets the two characters of Billy Ansel and Mitchell Stephens side by side to show the contrasting side of human character and their approaches of life after a tragedy.

Step-by-step explanation:

Billy Ansel and Mitchell Stephens are from the small town of Sam Dent in New York. An accident happened wherein a school bus drowned and in turn affects eight families of the deceased children. While Billy is also one of the victim's families, Mitchell isn't. Rather he is an attorney working on trying to sue the town authorities for the negligence and gain a lot of money from the lawsuit.

From Mitchell's narration, we came to know about his daughter's condition and addiction to drugs. In a way, he felt he had lost a daughter and in that sense, he is of the same situation with Billy. But their difference lies in that his daughter may be lost socially and be a drug addict but she isn't dead yet like the Ansel twins. And then there is also the aftermath of the incident. While Mitchell is adamant on getting action taken for the fatal incident though his own daughter or children aren't involved, Ansel isn't. It isn't that he doesn't care or isn't hurt but that he just think that whatever had happened is done and there us no way to get her daughters back and so there is no point in blaming anyone.

He had already lost his wife some years back and had been a part of the Vietnam War so he fully understands death is a part of life and he accepts the drowning as a tragedy too. But Mitchell's efforts in getting the court case is driven by his want for money, even though he doesn't suffer any loss in the drowning incident. The author sets them side by side to contrast the two and show their approaches to the incident.