160k views
0 votes
A man is exposed to a high amount of ultraviolet light. The light causes DNA in the cells of his eyes to suffer many mutations. His doctor claims that the mutations will not be passed to any future offspring. Which argument best describes the doctor's claim?

User Natassia
by
5.2k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Final answer:

The mutations in the man's eye cells caused by UV exposure are not inheritable because they occur in somatic cells, not reproductive germ cells. UV light damages DNA through the formation of pyrimidine dimers, and in humans, these are repaired by nucleotide excision repair.

Step-by-step explanation:

The doctor's claim that the mutations caused by ultraviolet (UV) light in the man's eye cells will not be passed on to future offspring is based on the understanding that UV light primarily affects somatic cells, which are any cells in the body that are not sperm or egg cells. Since only genetic information in the sperm or egg cells (germ cells) can be passed to offspring, mutations in somatic cells remain within the individual and are not heritable.

UV radiation can cause damage to DNA through the formation of pyrimidine dimers, particularly between thymine and cytosine. In humans, the initial mechanism for repairing such nucleotide errors in DNA is nucleotide excision repair. Although humans lack the photolyase enzyme, nucleotide excision repair is a complex, multi-step process by which a segment of the damaged DNA strand is removed and replaced with the correct sequence using the complementary strand as a template.

User Zahed
by
5.3k points
2 votes
i believe that the uv rays from what ever he was exposed to isn't passable because its not genetic so his offspring wouldn't be effective.
User Gautam Vasoya
by
5.7k points