Final answer:
Different perspectives in Ben Sasse's article and in the historical accounts of child labor debates highlight the importance of considering multiple viewpoints to understand complex issues fully.
Step-by-step explanation:
When analyzing "What to Do with the Kids This Summer? Put 'Em to Work" by Ben Sasse, it is evident that multiple perspectives are being utilized to forward the author's argument. This technique is common in persuasive writings, aiming to present a well-rounded discussion of the topic. Similarly, in the historical example of the debate over child labor in Great Britain, we encounter diverse viewpoints through the direct speech of Michael Sadler and the third-person reporting of John Thomas Hope's speech. Sadler provides a vivid account of the harsh conditions faced by children in textile factories, using emotionally charged language to persuade the members of Parliament. In contrast, Hope's arguments are presented in third person, possibly to add a layer of objectivity or detachment from his stance that child labor may not necessarily be harmful.
The importance of reading both accounts comes from the need to understand the multi-faceted nature of historical events. Each account offers a unique perspective that contributes to a more comprehensive understanding. When reading philosophical or argument-based texts, it is crucial to identify the different voices or perspectives, understand the dialectical method, and become aware of potentially hidden agendas in the arguments presented. This critical examination allows readers to more thoroughly engage with the material and develop a nuanced view of the issue at hand.