79.0k views
0 votes
PLEASE HELP ASAP

A homeowner decides to tile her rectangular porch floor, which has a length of 30 ft and width of 15 ft. It costs her $2.82 per square foot for tile. If instead she tiles a region that covers half the length and half the width, she will have to pay $317.25. Is this reasonable? Explain.

2 Answers

4 votes
No cause it will cost here half that much to do the hole thing
User Jakoss
by
8.3k points
2 votes
Total area to be tiled is (30 ft)(15 ft) = 450 ft^2.

At $2.82 per sq ft, that would come to $1269 for the entire floor.

If she tiles only 1/4 of this area, and the tile unit cost is the same, she'd pay $1269/4, or $317.25. Yes, this is entirely reasonable; she is not being charged anything for having a smaller area than originally specified tiled.

User MrJLP
by
7.9k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories