Question

You are yourself. You are your age. You have your friends and your family. You live in your culture, in this age. Now imagine that you are at a party. Something happens. You feel a strange tingle in your spine. You look around you, wondering what is happening. Suddenly you see why. The eyes you accidentally stumble on lock onto yours. You have never seen them before, but you feel like you always have known them. You should be ashamed—or at least embarrassed—to be looking into a stranger's eyes like this. After what could have been a year-and-a-half but was more likely a second-and-a-half the eyes hurriedly dart away. You move yours too, frantic to find something else to look at. Your sense of time and space is lost. Your concerns, your hopes, your dreams, your fears, your sense of self—everything, is forgotten. The bodies of your friends and fellow party-goers seem to drift around you. You hear faint, disembodied voices and sounds. You say something to someone—you don't know what or to whom—as you effortlessly drift toward an angelic figure across the floor. Suddenly the angel is in front of you. You have no idea what to say, but you say something anyway. He or she answers you, perfectly. The person says something halfway. You finish the thought. There is nothing else but the two of you. The figures, sounds, and images around you appear as wallpaper and white noise. Someone grabs your hand and whisks you away. It's time to leave. Hours later, you are walking home in the darkness, thinking of those eyes. You hear something, and your head spins around. You recognize that voice. He or she breaks away from a group and comes to you. "I love you," you say. "I can't stop thinking about you." "I know," you hear. "Meet me tomorrow." The next day you are married. You have changed, but the rest of the world is exactly the same. Think there are going to be some problems? What will your friends say? How about your family? Of course they will think that you are an idiot. The question is, are they right? Is it fair or accurate to call this "love"? What kind of a mess might this situation make? OBJECTIVES Decide if the scenario described above is true love. Defend your answer in a four-paragraph essay. Instructions In the first paragraph of your essay, state your position and introduce two reasons you will use to defend your position. In the second and third paragraphs, expand on your two reasons. In the fourth paragraph, talk about different kinds of love. If you think the above example is not true love, what is? If you think it is, what other kinds of love exist? Make sure each paragraph contains one main idea and supporting details. Use complete sentences including compound and complex sentences. Include proper transitions and an appropriate conclusion. Make sure your essay contains no errors in conventions such as spelling or grammatical errors. Your response should be at least 250 words.

Answer 1

Concerning Nemo, I'll confine this investigation to what we know from the 20,000 Associations epic and negligence data gave later in The Baffling Island just as later variations.

At the point when perusers first experience Nemo, they learn he seems fearless, fiery, and brave. He is tall, of uncertain age, and has wide-set eyes. He says, "As far as you might be concerned, I'm basically Chief Nemo," adding a position to the name "nobody" by which Odysseus (another ocean skipper) tricked the Cyclops.

Nemo gives an enormous amount of gold to a Grecian jumper, evidently to help in the uprising of Crete contrary to Hassock rule. Aronnax sees a bunch of artworks in Nemo's lodge, all representations of recorded progressives. Utilizing the Nautilus' smash, Nemo butchers a case of sperm whales to save some baleen whales. He at that point assaults and sinks a boat whose ethnicity is obscure to Aronnax. Following this demonstration of obliteration, Aronnax spies Nemo bowing and sobbing before a picture of a lady and two kids.

The Chief joins a few restricting qualities and assumptions:

He professes to help the discouraged, yet he planned the Nautilus with a particular two-class framework, and treats Aronnax as a privileged man of honor, as opposed to the manner in which he treats Conseil, Land, and his own group.

He monetarily bolsters opportunity looking for progressives, and his Mobilis in Mobili aphorism suggests an affection for opportunity, yet all who enter his Nautilus are limited on board until the end of time.

At the beginning, Nemo proclaims, "I'm not what you term a humanized man! I've cut off all binds with society, for reasons that I alone reserve the option to appreciate. In this manner I submit to none of its guidelines… " yet he plants a banner at the South Pole similarly as any imperialistic hero from a land country may.

It's notable that Verne at first gave Nemo an itemized back-story with a previous identity and an awful past to clarify his inspirations, however his distributer encouraged him to erase all that. We're left with an unexplained secret, a Byronic Leonardo da Vinci, a pillaging researcher, an ocean loner, a courteous fellow savage.

Like Skipper Ahab, Nemo experiences an upset past that drives him on an over the top maritime mission, bringing about frenzy. In contrast to Ahab, the reason isn't as apparent as a gnawed off leg, yet dwells just in his brain. His intentions stay as imperceptibly lowered as his submarine.

Step-by-step explanation: