171k views
5 votes
What were the benefits and drawbacks to Jimmy Carter’s status as a Washington, D.C. “outsider”?

2 Answers

1 vote

Final answer:

Being a Washington, D.C. “outsider” benefitted Jimmy Carter by allowing him to bring fresh perspectives, but it also hindered his ability to gain legislative success.

Step-by-step explanation:

Jimmy Carter’s status as a Washington, D.C. “outsider” had both benefits and drawbacks. One benefit was that Carter was seen as someone who could bring fresh perspectives and new ideas to the political establishment. His lack of previous experience in Washington helped him to appeal to voters who were disillusioned with political corruption.

However, being an outsider also had few drawbacks. Carter at that time faced challenges in getting support from key members of Congress because he excluded them from the decision-making process, preferring to rely on his own panels of experts to draft legislation. This alienated Congress and hindered Carter’s ability to gain legislative success.

User JMGM
by
8.3k points
0 votes
Many politicians, especially today, like to claim "outsider status"--in that they aren't burdened by a history in Washington. The down side to this is that they also don't have many political alliances. 
User Dierdre
by
8.9k points