53.1k views
1 vote
Prior to the intellectual revolutions of the 18th century, two of the primary assumptions of Western thought regarding the origins and development of humankind were:

A. The fixed (immutable) nature of all living creatures and man's dominance of nature (great chain of being).
B. The variation in nature was caused by genetic mutation and living organisms change over time.
C. Intelligent design and Lamarckian evolution.
D. Cultural relativism and disequalibrium.

2 Answers

6 votes

Final answer:

Before the 18th century, Western thought was dominated by the belief in the immutable nature of all living creatures and a divinely created hierarchy, the 'great chain of being'. The intellectual revolutions and scientific advancements of the Enlightenment era began to challenge this static view, laying the foundations for evolutionary theory. Therefore, the correct assumption is A: The fixed nature of all living creatures and man's dominance of nature.

Step-by-step explanation:

Prior to the intellectual revolutions of the 18th century, two of the primary assumptions of Western thought regarding the origins and development of humankind were: A. The fixed (immutable) nature of all living creatures and man's dominance of nature (great chain of being). This concept is rooted in the belief that a supreme being created the world and all living creatures in a static, unchanging state, with a divinely ordained hierarchy known as the 'great chain of being'. This hierarchy placed humans above other forms of life and emphasized the natural world's unchanging character.

It wasn't until the Enlightenment and subsequent scientific discoveries that alternative views began to emerge. Thinkers like James Hutton and Charles Lyell laid the groundwork for understanding gradual geological change and a much greater age of the Earth, which would later influence Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. Lamarck also offered early ideas about how species might change over time.

In contrast, the concepts of genetic mutation driving variation and change in organisms, intelligent design, Lamarckian evolution, cultural relativism, and disequilibrium did not form the basis of thinking about human origins and natural history until later intellectual developments.

User KristoferA
by
5.7k points
3 votes

Answer:

Correct answers are A and C

Step-by-step explanation:

A. The «great chain of being» is a medieval concept, a hierarchal structure of matter and living organisms promulgated by Christianity, which put God on top of it all: first God (spirit form), then humans (matter and spirit), then animals and plants (only matter).

B. The concept of «genetic mutation» belongs to de 19th century, when Gregor Mendel started studying genetics as a science. Even though inherit traits had been observed before him, he was the first one to analyze them though a modern science approach.

C. Inherit traits have been observed by many before the 18th century. Aristotle, for example, observed the animal's structure changed according to their feeding routines or where they lived (Darwin, for example, then observed those traits but developed the theory of evolution). Lamarck fathomed the concept of «soft inheritance» but it had been around since the classical era.

D. Cultural relativism is a concept that was originated later on, in the 20th century.

So, we can rule out B and C because of temporal timeline (concepts developed after the 18th century), whereas A and C mention ideas that belong to medieval and classical ages.

User Driss NEJJAR
by
5.9k points