Answer:
Method 1 has bigger forecast bias.
Explanation:
We are given the following information in the question:
Actuals:
23, 10, 15, 19
Method 1 prediction:
23, 5, 14, 20
Residuals = Predicted - Actuals
Sum of square of errors:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01633/016339a68d171d6a16b3b41726b35ce434743d4d" alt="=(23-23)^2+(5-10)^2+(14-15)^2+(20-19)^2\\= 27"
Mean squared error:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93765/937653a5f3e97e64b4a5c64f940f1a41c9acaf04" alt="\frac{\text{Sum of squares}}{n} = (27)/(4) = 6.75"
Method 2 prediction:
20, 13, 14, 20
Residuals = Predicted - Actuals
Sum of square of errors:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3016/f30163c25759d26edc3b808ca3cd9b33571150bd" alt="=(20-23)^2+(13-10)^2+(14-15)^2+(20-19)^2\\= 20"
Mean squared error:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bde14/bde1413888772b04ef0caedfc99415ec8f44b2fb" alt="\frac{\text{Sum of squares}}{n} = (20)/(4) = 5"
Since, mean square error of method 2 is less as compared to method 1, method 1 has bigger forecast bias.