26.3k views
0 votes
The regression equation NetIncome = 2,159 + .0312 Revenue was estimated from a sample of 100 leading world companies (variables are in millions of dollars).

(a-1) Calculate the residual for the x, y pair ($45,533, $2,697). (A negative value should be indicated by a minus sign. Round your answer to 4 decimal places.) Residual
(a-2) Did the regression equation underestimate or overestimate the net income? The regression equation overestimated the net income. The regression equation underestimated the net income.
(b-1) Calculate the residual for the x, y pair ($60,417, $3,497). (A negative value should be indicated by a minus sign. Round your answer to 4 decimal places.) Residual
(b-2) Did the regression equation underestimate or overestimate the net income? The regression equation overestimated the net income. The regression equation underestimated the net income.

1 Answer

7 votes

Answer:

a) -882.6296

b) The regression equation overestimated the net income.

c) -547.0104

d) The regression equation overestimated the net income.

Explanation:

We are given the following information in the question:

The regression equation for net income is given by:


\text{Net Income} = y = 2159 + .0312(\text{Revenue})

a) residual for the (x, y) pair ($45,533, $2,697)

Calculated net income =


2159 + .0312(45533) = 3579.6296

Residual = Observed net income - Calculated net income


\text{Residual} = 2697-3579.6296 = -882.6296

b) The regression equation overestimated the net income.

c) residual for the (x, y) pair ($60,417, $3,497)

Calculated net income =


2159 + .0312(60417) = 4044.0104

Residual = Observed net income - Calculated net income


\text{Residual} = 3497-4044.0104 = -547.0104

d) The regression equation overestimated the net income.

User TheHvidsten
by
7.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories