Final Answer
(A) ∫∫S₂F⋅dS = 0.5
(B) ∫∫S₂F⋅dS = 1/3
(A) ∫∫S₂F⋅dS = 0.5, (B) ∫∫S₂F⋅dS = 1/3. In (A), the flux is 1/16 of that through S₁; in (B), it's 1/16³, reflecting the inverse square and cube relationships with distance, respectively.
Explanation
In part (A), when the magnitude of F is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the origin, the flux integral ∫∫S₂F⋅dS can be determined by using the relationship between the flux and the radius of the sphere. The flux through a sphere is proportional to the inverse of the radius. Since S₂ has a radius of 16, and the flux integral is inversely proportional, the value is 1/16 of the flux through S₁. As ∫∫S₁F⋅dS is given as 8, ∫∫S₂F⋅dS would be 8/16 = 0.5.
In part (B), when the magnitude of F is inversely proportional to the cube of the distance from the origin, the relationship changes. The flux through a sphere is now inversely proportional to the cube of the radius. Therefore, for S₂ with a radius of 16, the flux is 1/16³ of the flux through S₁. As ∫∫S₁F⋅dS is given as 8, ∫∫S₂F⋅dS would be 8/(16³) = 1/3.
These results showcase the impact of the inverse relationship between the magnitude of the force field and the distance from the origin on the flux through different spheres. The mathematical calculations are based on the principles of flux through a sphere and the given conditions of the force field.