81.5k views
1 vote
Jack owns a 10% interest in a partnership (not real estate) in which his at-risk amount is $42,000 at the beginning of the year. During the year, the partnership borrows $80,000 on a nonrecourse note and incurs a loss of $60,000 from operations. Jack's at-risk amount at the end of the year is $44,000. T/F

User Kintela
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

After calculation risk amount is $36000

But in question it is given $44000

So it is false statement

Step-by-step explanation:

The amount which is paid by a taxpayer is in risk is expanded by a lot of extra plan of action obligation and diminished by the portion of misfortunes from the action.

The at-risk amount is not affected by non recourse debt. Jack's year-end at-risk amount is


42000-(60000* 10)/(100)=42000-6000=36000

But in question it is given that risk amount at the end will be $44000

So it is false statement

User Keith Davidson
by
7.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories