154k views
1 vote
Which of the following, if true, would be Herman’s best defense against an ADA claim?

A. Bad eyesight is not a disability under the ADA.
B. There is nothing reasonable that can be done to accommodate Jake’s eyesight.
C. Jake would need special equipment to do the job and the employer does not have to supply anything to its employees.
D. Jake is old and would not keep the job for more than a few years.

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer: There is nothing reasonable that can be done to accommodate Jake’s eyesight.

User Tian
by
5.4k points