191k views
1 vote
What criteria might a judge who abides by a philosophy of judicial restraint use to decide a case?

What criteria might a judge who abides by a philosophy of judicial restraint use to-example-1

1 Answer

5 votes

The judge would consider both the intent of the Framers who wrote the part of the Constitution in question and previous court decisions on the topic.

Step-by-step explanation:

When laws are framed, it is often misinterpreted and this allows for arguments and debates and what is the actual intent behind such a law when it was created a long time ago. It has to be examined from various perspectives. There are two methods in order to analyze the purpose behind such a creation of law.

Firstly, judicial restraint promotes strict and narrow interpretation of the law whereas the second one is the judicial activism. A law and its suitability can be analyzed depending upon the political and personal point of view.

User Cabdirashiid
by
8.3k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.