2 Answers

Shayonj · Answer 1 · 2020-04-09T07:29:15+0000

Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution didn't need a Bill of Rights, that it would create a "parchment barrier" that limited the rights of the people, as opposed to protecting them.

NakaBr · Answer 2 · 2020-04-13T07:05:33+0000

Answer:

Madison argued that the Constitution didn't need a Bill of Rights, that it would create a "parchment barrier" that limited the rights of the people, as opposed to protecting them.

Step-by-step explanation:

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

2 Answers

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Other Questions