Question

Student VersionAccording to Boling (2010, p. 2), "At heart, the design case is a description of a real artifact or experience that has been intentionally designed." She explains that the primary goal of a design case is to provide designers with precedent--defined by Oxman as "the unique knowledge embedded in a known design" (as quoted in Boling, 2010, p. 2). She further explains that expert designers are aware of numerous precedents which may be helpful in future designs. For example, educational game designers can view unique cases of game designs as precedents, which, in turn, may facilitate design of new games.Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?A. Word-for-Word plagiarismB. Paraphrasing plagiarismC. This is not plagiarism

Answer 1

The given student version is an instance of paraphrasing plagiarism, as it restates Boling's ideas without proper citation.

Step-by-step explanation:

The student version provided is an example of paraphrasing plagiarism. The original text by Boling (2010) has been restated in the student's work without proper citation. While the student has attempted to convey the same meaning using different words, failing to provide credit to Boling for the original ideas and statements constitutes paraphrasing plagiarism.

Academic integrity requires not only the restatement of information in one's own words but also the proper attribution to the original source. This includes using citations for ideas that have influenced one's work even when direct quotes are not used. Design cases and their use in informing future design through precedent is an important concept in fields such as engineering and educational game design, and recognizing the work of previous scholars is crucial.

Answer 2

Answer: Option (A)

Step-by-step explanation:

Here, in this particular case, the student is involved in word-for-word plagiarism. Here the student tends to takes a series of either seven or more words from someone's source, but further fails to recognize the quoted phrases or paragraph, fails to substantiate the full text excerpt so as to credit the writer of the section, and thus further fails to contribute the bibliography.