Final answer:
The statement is false; red light has a longer wavelength and lower energy compared to blue light, as energy increases with higher frequency and shorter wavelength.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that red light has a longer wavelength and higher energy than blue light is False. In the electromagnetic spectrum, red light actually has the longest wavelengths and the lowest frequencies, which means it has lower energy compared to blue light. Blue light has shorter wavelengths and higher frequencies, leading to higher energy. For example, violet light, which is close to blue in the spectrum, even has higher frequencies and shorter wavelengths than blue, endowing it with the most energy in the visible spectrum. Therefore, the correct relationship according to the properties of light is that a longer wavelength corresponds to lower energy, and a shorter wavelength corresponds to higher energy.
To summarize the relationship: The sequence from red to blue to violet light in the visible spectrum shows an increase in frequency and a decrease in wavelength. As the frequency increases, so does the energy of the light. Therefore, red light, with its longest wavelength in the visible spectrum, has less energy compared to blue light, which has a shorter wavelength and higher frequency.