54.3k views
4 votes
Otero translated the phrase “three less than a number” into the expression 3-x. Which best describes the accuracy of Otero’s expression?(A.) It is accurate. The phrase can be translated as “three” = 3, “less than” = subtraction, and “a number” = x, so 3-x is the correct expression. (B.) It is inaccurate. Three is being subtracted from a number, so x-3 is what he should have written.(C.) It is inaccurate. Three is being compared to a number, so 3 < x is what he should have written.(D.) It is inaccurate. Three is being added to a number, so 3+x is what he should have written.

User Pree
by
7.7k points

2 Answers

7 votes

Answer:

b

Explanation:

User Tech Vanguard
by
9.4k points
5 votes

Answer:

Option B is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

Otero translated the phrase "three less than a number" into the expression 3 - x.

I think Otero gave a wrong expression for the phrase.

The true interpretation of the phrase is that if we assume the number as x then three less than a number means x - 3.

Therefore, Otero's expression is inaccurate. Three is being subtracted from a number, so x-3 is what he should have written. (Answer)

User Radarbob
by
8.5k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories