Answer:
B. The coefficient of determination is 54.76%. Therefore, 54.76% of the variation in weight can be explained by the regression line.
Explanation:
The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.
The coefficient of determination is a measure to quantify how a model explains an dependent variable.
The formula for the correlation coeffcient is given by:
![r=(n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y))/(√([n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]))](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/middle-school/h2kbdui9ydpsixheffu6h8g6vjzzbhe9ox.png)
The formula for the coefficient of determination is
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49e87/49e87b87e2ef2d4f87d64c4dce22fe6041328fe0" alt="r^2"
In our case the correlation coefficient obtained was 0.74
And the determination coefficient is
, and if we convert this into % we got 54.76%
Assume that height is the predictor (X) and weight is the response (Y)
And the best answer for this case is:
B. The coefficient of determination is 54.76%. Therefore, 54.76% of the variation in weight can be explained by the regression line.