Final answer:
Claude's plea of insanity is likely to be dismissed because being under the influence of a substance like cocaine does not meet the legal criteria for an insanity defense, which requires a significant and persistent mental disease or defect.
Step-by-step explanation:
The plea of insanity is likely to be dismissed in the case of Claude, who was high on cocaine at the time of assaulting a stranger because voluntary intoxication is generally not considered a valid basis for an insanity defense. Legal standards for insanity require that the defendant had a severe mental disease or defect at the time of the crime, which made them unable to understand the nature and quality of their act or to distinguish right from wrong. Being under the influence of drugs does not meet the criteria for a legal insanity defense because drug use is a conscious choice, and it does not equate to a long-term mental illness. Therefore, Claude's lacosk of awareness due to drug intoxication would not typically satisfy the legal requirements for an insanity plea.
Historical cases and legal precedents support the notion that insanity pleas are carefully scrutinized, and temporary insanity induced by voluntary substance abuse does not align with legal definitions of mental incapacity. Courts will often reject insanity defenses if the defendant's mental state can be attributed to voluntary intoxication rather than a persistent mental condition that impairs judgment.