Question

Write a dissenting opinion for the Dred Scott decision. Base your opinion on the facts in the case and rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States

Answer 1

He should have been freed because he was considered a slave and one state and not the other, they should have had free slaves be nationaly recongized, instead of having them be a free slave in one state, they should be a free slave in all states, their status shouldn't change just because they are going into another state's territory.

Answer 2

my opinion is that Dred scott decision was not far and that the slave should have been free it a good thing now this day we don't ave slaves

Step-by-step explanation: