107k views
0 votes
Which conclusion do U.S. attitudes toward the Panama Canal during the 20th

century support?
O
A. Historical context can only be determined long after an event has
passed.
O
B. Biases prevent most people from participating in a changing
historical context.
C. People's points of view can change to suit changes in historical
context.
O
D. Contextualization of a historical event should not be changed once
it has been made.

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

U.S. attitudes toward the Panama Canal during the 20th century supported the conclusion that people's points of view can change to suit changes in historical context.

Step-by-step explanation:

The conclusion that U.S. attitudes toward the Panama Canal during the 20th century support is: People's points of view can change to suit changes in historical context.

Throughout the 20th century, U.S. attitudes toward the Panama Canal underwent significant changes. Initially, the U.S. favored building a canal in a less advantageous location in Panama but later supported the Panamanian Revolution and backed the construction of the canal in Panama. The evolving attitudes of the U.S. demonstrate how people's viewpoints can adapt and change based on historical context.

For example, in the early 1900s, the U.S. supported the Panama Canal project in Panama after backing the Panamanian Revolution. This decision changed the perspective of the U.S. government, demonstrating how historical context influenced the U.S. attitude towards the canal.

User Aamiri
by
8.1k points