189k views
5 votes
A staff member at UF's Wellness Center is interested in seeing if a new stress reduction program will lower employees high blood pressure levels. Twenty people are selected and have their blood pressure measured. Each person then participates in the stress reduction program. One month after the stress reduction program, the blood pressure levels of the employees were measured again. Did the program reduce the average blood pressure level? The 95% confidence interval was (5.6, 10.2). What can we expect will be the p-value for a two sided test using this data?

User Unexplored
by
6.5k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

The p-value should be smaller than 0.05.

Explanation:

The only information we have is the 95% confidence interval for the difference of means. As the lower bound is positive, we are 95% confident that the reduction program had a effect in the blood pressure level.

Then, as the program had a effect in the blood pressure level, we know that the null hypothesis, that states that the blood pressure levels would no change significantly, is rejected.

If the significance level is 0.05, according to the confidence of the interval, to reject the null hypothesis, the p-value had to be lower than the significance level.

Then, the p-value should be lower than 0.05.

User Tim Tyler
by
6.6k points
4 votes

Answer:

The average blood pressure were higher than after

Explanation:

As twenty people are selected and their blood pressure measured. After one month as stress reduction program BP were measured .Confidence interval is 95% so we conduct that blood pressure were higher than after reduction program.

User Superjer
by
5.7k points