Answer:
Levitt and Dubner’s argument uses logic to present evidence to arrive at their final conclusions about morality and human cheating practices. The examples they used were of Sumo wrestler's in Japan and the bagel business of a self-employed man who provided bagel's and cream cheese to office worker's on the "honor system". Levitt and Dubner used factual evidence as well as some illustrations to present their claims. They concluded that although cheating exists when there is high incentive, most people are inherently honest when incentives are not a factor.
Step-by-step explanation: