125k views
0 votes
Given the following null and alternative hypotheses H0: μ1 ≥ μ2 HA: μ1 < μ2 Together with the following sample information (shown below). Assuming that the populations are normally distributed with equal variances, test at the 0.10 level of significance whether you would reject the null hypothesis based on the sample information. Use the test statistic approach. Sample 1 Sample 2 n1 = 14 n2 = 18 x-bar1 = 565 x-bar2 = 578 s1 = 28.9 s2 = 26.3

User Zooking
by
5.8k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

Null hypothesis:
\mu_1 \geq \mu_2

Alternative hypothesis:
\mu_1 <\mu_2


t=-1.329


p_v =P(t_(30)<-1.329) =0.0969

With the p value obtained and using the significance level given
\alpha=0.1 we have
p_v<\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 10% of significance the mena of the group 1 is significantly lower than the mean for the group 2.

Explanation:

When we have two independnet samples from two normal distributions with equal variances we are assuming that


\sigma^2_1 =\sigma^2_2 =\sigma^2

And the statistic is given by this formula:


t=\frac{(\bar X_1 -\bar X_2)-(\mu_(1)-\mu_2)}{S_p\sqrt{(1)/(n_1)}+(1)/(n_2)}

Where t follows a t distribution with
n_1+n_2 -2 degrees of freedom and the pooled variance
S^2_p is given by this formula:


\S^2_p =((n_1-1)S^2_1 +(n_2 -1)S^2_2)/(n_1 +n_2 -2)

This last one is an unbiased estimator of the common variance
\simga^2

The system of hypothesis on this case are:

Null hypothesis:
\mu_1 \geq \mu_2

Alternative hypothesis:
\mu_1 <\mu_2

Or equivalently:

Null hypothesis:
\mu_1 - \mu_2 \geq 0

Alternative hypothesis:
\mu_1 -\mu_2<0

Our notation on this case :


n_1 =14 represent the sample size for group 1


n_2 =18 represent the sample size for group 2


\bar X_1 =565 represent the sample mean for the group 1


\bar X_2 =578 represent the sample mean for the group 2


s_1=28.9 represent the sample standard deviation for group 1


s_2=26.3 represent the sample standard deviation for group 2

First we can begin finding the pooled variance:


\S^2_p =((14-1)(28.9)^2 +(18 -1)(26.3)^2)/(14 +18 -2)=753.882

And the deviation would be just the square root of the variance:


S_p=27.457

And now we can calculate the statistic:


t=\frac{(565 -578)-(0)}{27.457\sqrt{(1)/(14)}+(1)/(18)}=-1.329

Now we can calculate the degrees of freedom given by:


df=14+18-2=30

And now we can calculate the p value using the altenative hypothesis:


p_v =P(t_(30)<-1.329) =0.0969

So with the p value obtained and using the significance level given
\alpha=0.1 we have
p_v<\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 10% of significance the mena of the group 1 is significantly lower than the mean for the group 2.

User Tinyfiledialogs
by
5.7k points