Question

Which of these statements regarding project crashing is true?

Crashing is not possible unless there are multiple critical paths.
Activities not on the critical path cannot become critical after crashing.
Crashing shortens the project duration by assigning more resources to one or more of the critical tasks.
Crashing a project often reduces the time it takes for lengthy or complex, but noncritical activities.

Answer 1

In project management, project crashing shortens the project duration by assigning more resources to critical tasks. It is a method used to decrease the schedule time, and noncritical tasks can potentially become critical after crashing.

Step-by-step explanation:

One true statement regarding project crashing is that it shortens the project duration by assigning more resources to one or more of the critical tasks. Crashing is a technique to reduce the project schedule by increasing staffing or working additional hours. In contrast to the misconceptions, crashing is possible even if there is only one critical path, and secondary activities that are not initially critical can become critical after the crashing process if their timelines are affected. Therefore, the duration of noncritical activities is typically not reduced directly through the action of crashing; rather, such a reduction might occur indirectly if resources are reallocated from noncritical to critical tasks, assuming this does not affect the completion times of the noncritical tasks negatively.