125k views
3 votes
The Sheriff's Department has information to believe that illegal automatic weapons are being hidden in a garage on Mary Halberstam's property. The information was obtained from a confidential informant who specified that the illegal weapons were assault rifles and that Mary has secured ammunition for the weapons in hopes of arming her friends against a looming government conspiracy. The Sheriff's Department has a list of weapons that had been reported as stolen from a local gun store and the confidential informant confirmed those were the same weapons he had seen on Mary's property. Theinformant made a sworn statement in the form of affidavit that was presented to a judge,who issued a search warrant for "any and all illegal items" in the home and garage of Mary, listing her proper address. The Sheriff's Department executed a search warrant at Mary's home by forcing open her front door without knocking or announcing their presence and discovered the illegal weapons that matched the inventory from the Army Depot in her home and the garage.Mary challenges the search warrant as unconstitutional. She may succeed because:

a. the evidence presented to the magistrate did not amount to probable cause.
b. only the United States Army had authorization to investigate the case.
c. the search warrant did not adequately describe the things to be seized.
d. the affidavit was based on the word of a confidential informant.

User Wenneguen
by
6.7k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

a. the evidence presented to the magistrate did not amount to probable cause

Step-by-step explanation:

Wasnt Enough PC

User DaveArmstrong
by
5.7k points