48.9k views
1 vote
Can someone help me with this????? The question is attached in the image

Can someone help me with this????? The question is attached in the image-example-1

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

See explanation

Explanation:

Since
\overline{CB} is parallel to
\overline {ED}, then

  • angles EDF and CBF are congruent as alternate interior angles when parallel lines
    \overline{CB} is parallel to
    \overline {ED} intersect by transversal DB;
  • angles DEF and BCF are congruent as alternate interior angles when parallel lines
    \overline{CB} is parallel to
    \overline {ED} intersect by transversal CE.

Consider triangles CBF and EDF. In these triangles:


  • \angle EDF\cong \angle CBF (proven);

  • \angle FED\cong \angle FCB (proven);

  • \overline{CB}\cong \overline {ED} (given).

Thus, triangles CBF and EDF are congruent by ASA postulate.

User Marc Friedman
by
8.4k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories