185k views
3 votes
A manager in your company is proposing the acquisition of Taylor Company, which has developed a new, innovative product instead of a strategy of developing new products in-house. All of the following arguments are correct EXCEPT: a. the outcomes of acquisitions can be estimated more easily and accurately than the outcomes for an internal product development process. b. acquisitions could become a substitute for innovation within your firm. c. the acquisition of Taylor should be primarily for defensive rather than strategic reasons. d. research suggests that acquisition strategies are a common means of avoiding risky internal ventures.

User Osu
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Answer:

The answer is c.the acquisition of Taylor should be primarily for defensive rather than strategic reasons.

Step-by-step explanation:

The acquisition of Taylor may not be mainly because of defensive reasons as it may arise from the acquirer's strategies to boost growth ( in term of market share or revenue) in a short period of time; to quickly diversify its products and services helping them less dependent on single source of income/ market share; or to complete their supply chain so they are able to serve customers from the beginning to the end of their Products/ services thus increase their profit margin by saving costs paid to suppliers.

User Norman Maurer
by
8.0k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.