Final answer:
Kalanick's leadership is described as transactional, focusing on organizational goals and control, while Khosrowshahi employs a transformational style, nurturing and inspiring employees to grow.
Step-by-step explanation:
Kalanick's way of leading was one that focused on doing whatever it took for his company to succeed, or transactional power, whereas Khosrowshahi's way of leading is focused on growing and inspiring employees, or transformational power. The transactional leadership style is characteristic of leaders who focus on supervision and organizational goals achieved through a system of rewards and punishments. In contrast, the transformational leadership style is associated with leaders who are charismatic role models, inspirational, and seek to nurture and change the organization by being intellectually stimulating and individually considerate towards their employees.
Research by Eagly, Johannesen-Schmidt, & van Engen suggests that transformational leadership approaches are generally more effective than transactional ones. Leaders with transformational qualities are not only goal-oriented but also provide developmental opportunities for their followers, aligning with the individual needs for growth within the organization. On the other hand, those employing transactional methods may focus on maintaining the status quo through a system of control and extrinsic rewards and punishments.